project management software with client portal

17 Best project management software with client portals in 2026

Vivienne Chen May 27, 2025

Assembly gives your team client-linked tasks, recurring automations, and a branded portal where files, invoices, and client communication stay connected to every project. Try for free!

17 Best project management software with client portals in 2026

Finding the right project management software with a client portal can save your team hours of back-and-forth with clients every week. I tested dozens of platforms to find the 17 best options for 2026.

💻 Tool 🎯 Best for 💰 Starting price (annual) 🧩 Portal ⚡ Strengths
Assembly Firms that want a tailored client portal tied to project delivery $39/month ✅ Tasks tied to client records, recurring automations, dynamic client homepages, consolidated payments
ClickUp Teams that need deep task control and multiple project views $7/user/month ⚠️ Flexible layouts, strong customization, broad integrations
monday.com Visual teams that plan work through boards and dashboards $12/user/month (min. 3 seats) ⚠️ Multiple views, automation, guest access
Teamwork.com Client-facing teams that bill by the hour $9.99/user/month ✅ Client permissions, time tracking, billing integration
FuseBase Teams that want a client portal with collaboration and knowledge sharing $32/month ✅ White-label portals, AI assistants, detailed permissions
Wrike Mid-to-large teams managing complex cross-functional projects $10/user/month ⚠️ Intake forms, workflows, cross-team visibility
Asana Teams that rely on structured workflows and task dependencies $10.99/user/month ⚠️ Dependencies, templates, guest access
Notion Teams that want flexible docs with light project tracking $10/user/month ⚠️ Flexible pages, databases, integrations
Basecamp Small teams focused on communication and file sharing $15/user/month ⚠️ Message boards, to-dos, simple client views

True client portals vs project management with client access: what's the difference?

Not every tool on this list gives clients the same experience. Some are built around a dedicated, branded space clients log into directly, while others give clients limited access to your internal workspace through guest permissions or shared views.

Here's what each means:

1. Assembly: Best for firms that want a tailored client portal tied to project delivery

What it does:

Assembly is a client portal platform that gives service firms a branded space where clients log in to access tasks, files, messages, invoices, and updates tied to their engagement.

Key features

Pros and cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Tasks tied to client records keep internal work and client context together Automation flexibility has room to grow for complex needs
Dynamic homepages allow tailored visibility Reporting tools are less advanced than standalone platforms

Pricing

💻 Pricing plans 💰 Price billed annually 💰 Price billed monthly
Starter $39/month $59/month
Professional $149/month $189/month
Advanced $399/month $499/month
Enterprise Starts at $2,000/month Starts at $2,400/month

2. ClickUp: Best for teams that need deep task control and multiple project views

What it does:

ClickUp is a project management platform that lets teams organize tasks, track projects, and collaborate across lists, boards, Gantt charts, and calendars.

Key features

Pros and cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Broad range of project views Initial setup can overwhelm smaller teams
Strong automation options Guest access is limited

Pricing

ClickUp starts at $7 per user per month.

3. monday.com: Best for visual teams that plan work through boards and dashboards

What it does:

monday.com is a work management platform that lets teams plan, track, and collaborate on projects through visual boards, dashboards, and automated workflows.

Key features

Pros and cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Clear overview of project status Lack of a dedicated portal experience for clients
Automation covers status updates Minimum seat requirements can increase costs for smaller teams

Pricing

monday.com starts at $12 per user per month.

4. Teamwork.com: Best for client-facing teams that bill by the hour

What it does:

Teamwork.com is a project management platform with client delivery as the core feature.

Key features

Pros and cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Straightforward billable hour logging Interface may be challenging for new users
Budget tracking flags issues early

Pricing

Teamwork.com starts at $9.99 per user per month.

5. FuseBase: Best for teams that want a client portal with project collaboration and knowledge sharing

What it does:

FuseBase combines white-label portals with project management and knowledge management.

Key features

Pros and cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Distinct internal and client-facing workspaces Broad feature set can be overwhelming for new users
White-label experience for clients Fewer integrations compared to other platforms

Pricing

FuseBase starts at $32 per month.

6. Wrike: Best for mid-to-large teams managing complex cross-functional projects

What it does:

Wrike is built for structured workflows and manage cross-team visibility.

Key features

Pros and cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Reduces back-and-forth on requests Platform may require time to configure
Dashboards provide an overview across projects Limited client-facing features

Pricing

Wrike starts at $10 per user per month.

7. Asana: Best for teams that rely on structured workflows and task dependencies

What it does:

Asana helps teams organize structured task lists and track dependencies.

Key features

Pros and cons

✅ Pros ❌ Cons
Organizes tasks effectively Guest access does not provide a dedicated portal
Reusable templates reduce setup time Reporting features are limited on lower tiers

Pricing

Asana starts at $10.99 per user per month.

Conclusion

When selecting project management software with a client portal, consider how much of your workflow is client-facing and your team's requirements for internal structure. Tools like Assembly align well with service firms where client experience is crucial. For more purely internal workflows with some client access, tools like ClickUp or Wrike may be more appropriate.